from Ben-Dror Yemini's Friday column
("The fraud that is UNRWA"):
Translated by Elizabeth Rimini
month the U.S. Senate received a precedential decision regarding
refugees UNRWA and the Palestinian Arabs. To understand the change one
should have mentioned that UNRWA’s beginning was appropriate. A UN
relief organization for the British Mandate Arabs, most of whom fled and
some were deported, due to Arab aggression seeking to destroy Israel
just as it has been established. But the treatment of refugees changed
direction, and instead of a caretaker, UNRWA became a reproduction,
exacerbation and perpetuation plant of tremendous size.
two UN bodies dealing with refugees. High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR) that handles all the world's refugees, and UNRWA, which deals
only with the ones that became the Palestinian Arabs (at first they did
not know that they are so. They were Arabs. Separate identity developed
later). The Commissioner dealt with fifty million people. They won the
first aid, and they are no longer refugees. UNRWA, however, started the
way with 711 thousand, and miraculously has made them into more than
five million. The Commissioner rehabilitates refugees. UNRWA fosters,
multiplies and perpetuates the refugee problem.
This paradox is
known to anyone who has eyes in his head. It comes from many reasons.
One is the strange definition of UNRWA refugee: “They were in the
territory of Palestine between June 1946 and May 1948 and lost both
their homes and livelihoods as a result of the Arab - Israeli conflict.”
But over time their descendants also came into the frame, and strangely
enough, and contrary to the definition, also those who were not needed
in the first place, and even those who became wealthy later – were still
considered a refugee. Thus the number of “refugees” is rising over the
years in somewhat vertiginous and strange manner.
background, in recent months MK Dr. Einat Wilf worked, in cooperation
with AIPAC, to influence the primary source of funding for UNRWA - the
United States. The result is the "Kirk Amendment," named after the
Republican senator Mark Kirk. His amendment would require the State
Department to report what is the actual number of original refugees,
answering to the definition that appears in the original mandate of
UNRWA. It is estimated at only 30,000.
There is something
sophisticated in Kirk’s amendment, because the Amendment does not demand
a cut in aid or a change in the criteria. These are reporting
requirements only - A report on the number of original refugees, and a
report on the number of descendants. But reports on the amendment made
it clear that this entails a first step towards a more fundamental
change. As following the report the question will rise - why should
taxpayers pay for those who are not really refugees?
these questions have been popping up. U.S. Undersecretary of State,
Thomas Nides, sent a letter to the Senate Appropriations Committee,
which is urging them to vote against the amendment. He claims that the
issue is particularly sensitive, the U.S. should not intervene in
determining the number of refugees, and that this matter should be
resolved in negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs.
Embassy of Jordan in Washington has put pressure against the adoption of
the amendment, and Nides notes in his letter that the amendment might
create "a negative reaction, especially in Jordan."
request was denied. The amendment passed. Meanwhile there are no strong
blast waves. And it’s a shame. It's time to blow up the bloated balloon,
of ever-swelling Palestinian refugees numbers. On the day the
Palestinian "refugees" will be treated similarly to the tens of millions
of other refugees in the world - will be the day when the situation
will begin to improve, along with prospects for peace. Because the
“refugee problem,” as the Arab side stated over and over again, “is
perpetuated in order to achieve the solution of the elimination of
The treatment so far of the problem of refugees has
become the biggest obstacle to peace. It’s time for a change. The U.S.
Senate took a preliminary step, limited and uncertain - A step in the
right direction. Hopefully, the next steps will follow.
more points to the attention of the Congress: By official count of
UNRWA, the number of refugees in Lebanon reached early last year to
425,000. However, according to a study published by the American
University of Beirut, which UNRWA itself has helped finance; it is only
260 to 280 thousands. They are immigrating and fleeing from Arab
countries, because they suffer from severe apartheid in the Arab world
(also according to the report). So there is no connection between the
number registered and funded and the number of those still there. So the
United States, which is the primary contributor, should pose the
obvious question: where exactly does the money go, when there is a 57%
exaggeration in the number of refugees?
And yet another fraud:
under the UN Refugee Convention, Article 1 (A) 2, those who received
citizenship in any country, cannot be considered a refugee. And here,
according to UNRWA's official publication, Jordan has more than two
million refugees, the vast majority of whom have Jordanian nationality.
So you can decrease two millions in Jordan, and another 150 thousand in
Lebanon and Syria is likely in a similar situation. There the number is
also an inflated. Recommendation to this effect is also found in the
report filed by James Lindsey. For seven years, Lindsey served as a
senior UNRWA official. After his retirement, he was a research fellow in
the “Washington Institute", where he published a comprehensive study
with deep reform proposals.
And the parade goes on. UNRWA has a
staff of more than 29,000 people, only two hundred of whom are not
Palestinians - a great mechanism that also deals with incitement through
the education system held by the organization. This is the largest
agency of the United Nations. Just for comparison, UNHCR, the Commission
that handles all other refugees of the world, holds a much smaller team
of 7,685 employees, and handles 34 million refugees.
UNRWA – has one employee per 172 patients. In UNHCR - one employee per 4,424 patients.
per capita budget is also more than double than the UNHCR. Considering
that many of those listed are already citizens of other countries, or
that the lists are inflated, as in Lebanon, then it means that a
Palestinian Arab “refugee” costs the international community,
particularly the U.S., far more than any other refugee in the world.
chain of absurdities and frauds must be stopped. Uniformity in
definitions and norms is necessary. The anti-Israel side argues again
and again that Israel should abide by international norms - Great and
just demand. This is exactly what should happen, even with the refugees –
the same definitions for “who is a refugee ", and the same treatment of
rescuing the really needing rather than perpetuating them as
“refugees.” This will be the greatest contribution of the international
community to promote peace. Senator Kirk began. Hopefully he will