Wednesday, November 21, 2007

A Peace Conference which nobody believes in

New Centrist blogs about the upcoming Annapolis Peace Conference:

Two perspectives on the Israel-Palestine Annapolis Peace Conference, one from the left the other from the right, sharing a somewhat similar analysis but arriving at different conclusions. Both authors contend the position adopted by the Palestinian leadership—whether Fatah or Hamas—is perpetual war against the Jewish state. The maximalist Palestinian political parties, their leadership, and the individuals who vote for them, refuse to admit—to accept—a strong Jewish political presence in the region. There is simply no place for peace or reconciliation with people who hold the belief that Israel must be eliminated as a political entity and that Tel Aviv is part of Palestine. As to the different conclusions drawn, for Burston the solution is that of the center-left and Labor Zionists, a newly formed Palestinian which accepts a Jewish state next door. Halkin is not nearly as positive in his assessment, contending the West Bank will be absorbed (occupied?) by Jordan.

Read the rest of it, here.

2 Comments:

At 9:03 AM EST, Anonymous The New Centrist said...

Thanks for the link!

--TNC

 
At 6:34 PM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

And there's, as usual, Shoher's solution to the peace http://samsonblinded.org/blog/end-the-arab-occupation-of-the-west-bank.htm

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home