Friday, December 14, 2007

The de-mthyfication of a child martyr !!

A myth is a sacred narrative, believed by people who attach some metaphysical significance to it. In everyday parlance, myth is used pejoratively to indicate that a story which is widely known and presumed true, is in fact false.

The Al-Dura case is one such a myth.

The death of the boy al-Dura was used to fuel an ever-growing hatred towards Israel and support for the Palestinian Intifada., both in the territories, throughout the Arab world and elsewhere. One example of the uses it has been put to can be seen in this website which purports to provide an account of the
"Palestinian holocaust".

I blogged about the subject, here, here and here .

It appears now that plot thickens. Nidra Poller reports of a new development in what seems to be shaping up to be a tale that defies belief:



The wounds purportedly sustained on September 30 2000 by Jamal al Dura “target of gunfire from the Israeli positions”—in the words of France 2 bureau chief Charles Enderlin—were in fact incurred in 1992. Jamal, identified as the father of the shahid [martyr] Mohamed al Dura, is one of the two living witnesses to the incident that triggered the “Al Aqsa Intifada.” The al Dura news report has been the subject of controversy for seven years.


Philippe Karsenty, who is appealing his 2006 defamation conviction—for declaring on his Media-Ratings site that the al Dura news report was a blatant fake—obtained
medical records proving that Jamal’s wounds were treated by an Israeli surgeon in 1994. Now the surgeon, Yehuda David, has confirmed this information on a December 12 newscast on Israel’s Arutz 10 TV. Jean Tsadik of Metula News Agency resumed the Hebrew-language newscast for French-speaking readers.


According to the Metula release, Jamal al Dura declared on medical records in 1992 that Palestinian militia had attacked him with axes. Doctors at Gaza’s Shifa Hospital* were able to save his life but he lost the use of his right hand because they could not repair a ruptured tendon in the forearm. Palestinian doctors referred Jamal to Tal Hashomer hospital in
Tel Aviv in March 1994. Dr. Yehuda performed reconstructive surgery, grafting a tendon taken from the foot, and restoring almost normal use of the hand. The medical record of that operation also refers to the removal of “foreign bodies,” suggesting that other instruments besides axes were used in the 1992 attack.


Alerted by the Ména [Metula News Agency] to the film of Jamal’s wounds produced in 2004 by Talal Abu Rahma at the demand of France 2 news director Arlette Chabot, to silence investigators, Dr. Yehuda and his colleagues declare that the scars shown in that film were incurred in 1992 and result from axe blade wounds and definitely not from gunshot. They are ready and willing to testify to this in any court.
(Read the rest, here)

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home