More cake than
is good for them
Obama
is a gambler and he bets on the likelihood that Iran, the
quintessential leopard in the Middle East, will change its spots just because other animals treat it as if it were NOT a capable beast of prey. And anyway, if his gambit fails (as it's most likely to happen), it's other people's headache to deal with its detritus. Living in a vast continent flanked by two oceans and neighbors as belligerent as Canada, Obama can certainly afford to live with the consequences of his gambler's optimism.
What is Obama's thinking behind his strategy? Either he thinks that a better life for Iranians will induce the people to get rid of the ayatollah regime or that keeping the ayatollahs lubricated with candy will somehow keep them in check. Either way, he's mistaken, of course. People are unlikely to rebel when the regime can tell them with some justification, how well it serves them. And as for the second conjecture, its premise is based on the indulgent-lazy-parent tactic so well captured in
Jane Austen's novel "Persuasion":
The Contentious Centrist
"Civilization is not self-supporting. It is artificial. If you are not prepared to concern yourself with the upholding of civilization -- you are done." (Ortega y Gasset)
1 Comments:
"Persuasion" was translated into Farsi as "Targhib" in 2013:
http://www.amazon.com/Targhib-Persuasion-Persian-Jane-Austen/dp/9641850253
fwiw, #44 is not a gambler. He really believes he is undoing centuries of imperialism, from a Marxist end-of-religion viewpoint, with his Iran and Cuba 'legacies'.
and, #44 will always be remembered as the American President who lost Canada!
k2k
Post a Comment
<< Home