Hannah Arendt, “The Origins of Totalitarianism” (p. 3) provides a very
cogent insight into the issue of nationalism and internationalism:
“One
of the hasty explanations has been the identification of anti-Semitism
with rampant nationalism and its xenophobic outburst. Unfortunately,
the fact is that modern anti-Semitism grew in proportion as traditional
nationalism declined, and reached its climax at the exact moment when
the European system of nation-states and its precarious balance of
power crashed.
The Contentious Centrist
"Civilization is not self-supporting. It is artificial. If you are not prepared to concern yourself with the upholding of civilization -- you are done." (Ortega y Gasset)
Tuesday, May 19, 2015
It has
already been noticed that the Nazis were not simple nationalists. Their
nationalist propaganda was directed toward their fellow- travelers
and not their convinced members; the latter, on the contrary, were
never allowed to lose sight of a consistently supranational approach to
politics. Nazi “nationalism” had more than one aspect in common with
the recent nationalistic propaganda in the Soviet Union, which is also
used only to feed the prejudices of the masses. The Nazis had a genuine
and never revoked contempt for the narrowness of nationalism, the
provincialism of the nation-state, and they repeated time and again
that their movement, international in scope like the Bolshevik
movement, was more important to them than any state which would
necessarily be bound to specific territory. And not only the Nazis, but
fifty years of anti-Semitic history stand as evidence against the
identification of anti-Semitism with nationalism. The first
anti-Semitic parties in the last decades of the nineteenth century were
also among the first that banded together internationally. From the
very beginning, they called international congresses and were concerned
with a coordination of international, or at least inter-European,
activities.”
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home